McCreary, 1,956 patient casirivimab/imdevimab late treatment PSM study: 93% lower mortality [p=0.009], 56% lower combined mortality/hospitalization [p=0.0003], 48% lower hospitalization [p=0.005], and 40% fewer combined hospitalization/ER visits [p=0.003] https://c19p.org/mccreary
copied to clipboard
Association of subcutaneous or intravenous route of administration of casirivimab and imdevimab monoclonal antibodies with clinical outcomes in COVID-19
et al., medRxiv, doi:10.1101/2021.11.30.21266756 (Preprint)
Prospective study comparing subcutaneous and intravenous casirivimab/imdevimab, and comparing to a PSM matched control set, showing significantly lower mortality and hospitalization with treatment. Controls were matched with EUA-eligible risk factors only, authors were unable to determine symptom severity.Efficacy is variant dependent. Unlikely to be effective for omicron [Liu, Sheward, Tatham, VanBlargan].
1.
Liu et al., bioRxiv, doi:10.1101/2021.12.14.472719,
Striking Antibody Evasion Manifested by the Omicron Variant of SARS-CoV-2,
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.14.472719.
2.
Sheward et al., bioRxiv, doi:10.1101/2021.12.19.473354,
Variable loss of antibody potency against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 (Omicron),
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.19.473354.
|
risk of death, 93.0% lower, RR 0.07, p = 0.009, treatment 1 of 652 (0.2%), control 29 of 1,304 (2.2%), NNT 48, propensity score matching.
|
|
risk of death/hospitalization, 56.0% lower, RR 0.44, p < 0.001, treatment 22 of 652 (3.4%), control 101 of 1,304 (7.7%), NNT 23, propensity score matching, primary outcome.
|
|
risk of hospitalization, 48.0% lower, RR 0.52, p = 0.005, treatment 22 of 652 (3.4%), control 85 of 1,304 (6.5%), NNT 32, propensity score matching.
|
|
risk of hospitalization/ER, 40.0% lower, RR 0.60, p = 0.003, treatment 40 of 652 (6.1%), control 133 of 1,304 (10.2%), NNT 25, propensity score matching.
|
|
SQ vs. IV death, 53.0% lower, RR 0.47, p = 0.52, treatment 1 of 969 (0.1%), control 3 of 1,216 (0.2%), NNT 697, adjusted per study.
|
|
SQ vs. IV death/hosp., 71.0% higher, RR 1.71, p = 0.06, treatment 27 of 969 (2.8%), control 21 of 1,216 (1.7%), adjusted per study.
|
|
SQ vs. IV hospitalization, 79.0% higher, RR 1.79, p = 0.046, treatment 27 of 969 (2.8%), control 20 of 1,216 (1.6%), adjusted per study.
|
|
SQ vs. IV ER/hosp., 15.0% lower, RR 0.85, p = 0.38, treatment 47 of 969 (4.9%), control 71 of 1,216 (5.8%), NNT 101, adjusted per study.
|
| Effect extraction follows pre-specified rules prioritizing more serious outcomes. Submit updates |
McCreary et al., 12/1/2021, prospective, USA, North America, preprint, 27 authors, study period 14 July, 2021 - 26 October, 2021, average treatment delay 6.0 days.
Late treatment
is less effective
is less effective
Please send us corrections, updates, or comments. Vaccines and
treatments are both valuable and complementary. All practical, effective, and
safe means should be used. No treatment, vaccine, or intervention is 100%
available and effective for all current and future variants. Denying the
efficacy of any method increases mortality, morbidity, collateral damage, and
the risk of endemic status. We do not provide medical advice. Before taking
any medication, consult a qualified physician who can provide personalized
advice and details of risks and benefits based on your medical history and
situation. FLCCC and WCH
provide treatment protocols.